snmp_pf: fix refresh

Some refresh functions had two layers of 'do we need to refresh now?'
checks, leading to inconsistent refreshes.
Consolidate them.

PR:		291725
Sponsored by:	Rubicon Communications, LLC ("Netgate")
This commit is contained in:
Kristof Provost
2025-12-17 14:22:05 +01:00
parent e0c6c4ecfc
commit a862e4b5a2
+3 -12
View File
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ pf_tables(struct snmp_context __unused *ctx, struct snmp_value *val,
return (SNMP_ERR_NOT_WRITEABLE);
if (op == SNMP_OP_GET) {
if ((time(NULL) - pft_table_age) > PFT_TABLE_MAXAGE)
if (! started || (time(NULL) - pft_table_age) > PFT_TABLE_MAXAGE)
if (pft_refresh() == -1)
return (SNMP_ERR_GENERR);
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ pf_tbladdr(struct snmp_context __unused *ctx, struct snmp_value __unused *val,
asn_subid_t which = val->var.subs[sub - 1];
struct pfa_entry *e = NULL;
if ((time(NULL) - pfa_table_age) > PFA_TABLE_MAXAGE)
if (! started || (time(NULL) - pfa_table_age) > PFA_TABLE_MAXAGE)
pfa_refresh();
switch (op) {
@@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ pf_lbltable(struct snmp_context __unused *ctx, struct snmp_value *val,
asn_subid_t which = val->var.subs[sub - 1];
struct pfl_entry *e = NULL;
if ((time(NULL) - pfl_table_age) > PFL_TABLE_MAXAGE)
if (! started || (time(NULL) - pfl_table_age) > PFL_TABLE_MAXAGE)
pfl_refresh();
switch (op) {
@@ -1322,9 +1322,6 @@ pft_refresh(void)
struct pft_entry *e;
int i, numtbls = 1;
if (started && this_tick <= pf_tick)
return (0);
while (!TAILQ_EMPTY(&pft_table)) {
e = TAILQ_FIRST(&pft_table);
TAILQ_REMOVE(&pft_table, e, link);
@@ -1422,9 +1419,6 @@ pfa_refresh(void)
struct pfa_entry *e;
int i, numtbls = 1, cidx, naddrs;
if (started && this_tick <= pf_tick)
return (0);
while (!TAILQ_EMPTY(&pfa_table)) {
e = TAILQ_FIRST(&pfa_table);
TAILQ_REMOVE(&pfa_table, e, link);
@@ -1590,9 +1584,6 @@ pfl_refresh(void)
{
struct pfl_entry *e;
if (started && this_tick <= pf_tick)
return (0);
while (!TAILQ_EMPTY(&pfl_table)) {
e = TAILQ_FIRST(&pfl_table);
TAILQ_REMOVE(&pfl_table, e, link);